Duane Michals’ use of photo-manipulation and photomontage is a form of art that was heightened by the increase of technology. The use of transparent images in the overall composition is a method that uses our new technology to enhance the message of a piece. By using this method, Michals has broadened the idea of what we perceive as art and how we can derive a meaning from a piece. The use of a transparent face or person opens the piece up to multiple interpretations. I think this is what makes the images of his work and the work of other artists so interesting.
By opening the image up to multiple interpretations, Michals opens the field of discussion up to using each individual viewer’s past and prior experiences to help them find meaning in his pieces. I think the reason I find this so interesting is that it is a common for all artists to strive to find a way to show the transparent image in their composition. However, the lack of technology in the past has forced artists to portray this idea in a different manner. As technology increases, artists have more resources to use to convey their message. However, what Michals intended in the composition of the image may be completely different than what a viewer may get out of the visual experience. This is because of the open-ended feeling of their craft.
I think the most interesting and most successful use of this technology is shown in the images related to identity. The images about the world are interesting, however I am more drawn to the identity images. The reason for this is that the struggle to convey identity and emotion is one of the most common struggles for artists. The transparency of the people and faces convey a certain emotion that hasn’t really been able to be conveyed before.
Mallory, I like your reason as to why these artist used this style of photomontage. I can see how they would use the opaque strategy and transparency to convey to the viewer that they are not sure what their true identity is. Similar to what Michals said, he wasn't always sure of himself, but he always welcomed his failures.
ReplyDeleteI like how you pointed out that photomontage has come out of an increase in technology. Some might see that as something obvious but I see it as a very important point. Photomontage would not exist as it is today if it weren't for technology that assists in the process. The technology that has arisen has significantly helped in the process in ways that not much else could. If it weren't for the technology creation of such pieces would less likely come to be and thus less critical thinking would exist in this specific realm.
ReplyDeleteI really agree with what you said about portraying identities in Michael's pieces. Everything from the expression on a person's face to their posture, stance, or style can influence how an audience interprets them. I think it is fascinating to portray so much information about a person through photographs.
ReplyDelete